According to Evgeniy Terentev? both students and teachers believe that The top online learning will never provide high quality education? as it jeopardizes the social interaction processes inside universities and limits the opportunities for real interpersonal communication.
Online learning is also thought to The top
Exacerbate academic dishonesty? a problem that should be addressed weblium studio to make by new methods of testing. Students’ psychological wellbeing and mental health can also suffer as well. The survey reveals some alarming results? with 20% of students exhibiting symptoms of moderate or severe depression. A modernized infrastructure? additional psychological support? and efforts to improve teachers’ skills are all needed to address this problem.
Ivan Gruzdev? Director for Internal Monitoring and Student Academic Development? HSE University? says that a survey conducted before the transition to online studies shows that teachers see educational digitization as a process implemented in two opposite ways: using the authors find that the new top-down and bottom-up approaches. where the university administration propagates digitization tools (corporate systems? a series of online courses? etc)? while the bottom-up approach is where teachers acquire students’ habits of using online tools such as Telegram to chat with students? which can be beneficial for the teaching and learning processes.
Ivan Gruzdev
Ivan Gruzdev points out that? on the canada cell numbers one hand? teaching methods have hardly changed in online studies—we see the same methods and approaches used in Zoom as in the usual offline format. On the other hand? the fact that most teachers are now using videoconference calls shows their professional enthusiasm. Many instructors were quick to learn new digital tools that increased students’ involvement. They were willing to experiment with new systems and platforms? adapting rapidly to the new reality without any top-down directives.